An image from the film this blog is named after.

An image from the film this blog is named after.

Tuesday, May 12, 2020

BFI Top 50: The General, Released in 1926, Directed by Buster Keaton and Clyde Bruckman


What I know going in
I have actually seen the film once before and enjoyed quite a bit. I’m looking forward to a re-watch.

Immediate response
The General is a film dedicated to movement. There is a momentum to almost every shot, rarely is anything static, whether that is through the movement of the trains or the movement of the camera. In this way, The General, is the original action film. All the typical aspects of an action flick, from the car chases of The French Connection, to the whirring bodies of The Raid: Redemption, spring from chases and stunts presented in Keaton’s film. In a way, Keaton himself could be considered the original action hero. He starts the film as an ordinary dude, like Bruce Willis in Die Hard. He has to rescue a damsel in distress from a group of baddies and prevent an evil, complicated plot through skill, ingenuity, and luck. It is all very Indiana Jones-esque. Finally, he performs a series of courageous, death-defying stunts. All of these facets have been integrated into the DNA of every action film at this point.

The limited mobility of trains allows Keaton to pull off some very impressive tracking shots that would be impossible at the time if cars were used. Of particular note is the chase near the end where Keaton and his girlfriend are escaping from a northern camp to warn their friends. The camera zips back and forth between Keaton and his pursuers. Telegraph lines are ripped up, traps are laid, and people are thrown, tossed, and shuffled. There is a head-bopping rhythm to the editing in the train chases that is really enjoyable.

However, there is one aspect of the film that I did not like and that is Keaton’s status as a Confederate. I did not have a problem with Keaton’s own actions, because he seems to be acting purely out of desire for his girlfriend. But the movie has this weird tone where it seems to be pushing the Confederacy as underdogs. This also adds an uncomfortable edge the Confederate victory at the end. I really do not know why Keaton chose to position the film this way, you could easily switch his allegiance and nothing would change. I hesitate to accuse the movie of racism, but portraying the South as freedom fighters defending against Northern aggression smacks of revisionist history.

Further thoughts
The General has a surprising number of small comedic moments and observation that would not be out of place in a modern comedy. An early example is Keaton rubbing the tops of his shoes on the back of his pants legs. It’s a small moment which reveals that Keaton’s character is concerned about presenting himself to his girlfriend, but is also a bit of a schlub. Another neat moment occurs during the end chase. Keaton and his girlfriend are working together to power the train. They start conversing and she grabs a small part of his uniform and twists around in her fingers a bit. This is a very small, visual way to show her concern about him, and it is even better for showing up in a silent film, a genre most people mistakenly characterize as being full of over-the-top mugging. The same character, in throwaway bit of comic mischief, tosses a piece of wood for having a knothole.

Why is the film on this list?
The General is a technical masterpiece that embodies the term “moving picture” in every possible way.











No comments:

Post a Comment