What
I know going in
As a burgeoning film buff, I know the
basic outline of Rashomon. The film
involves the story of a rape/murder that is relayed to the audience through
different characters and each character manipulates the story in a new way. The
only other Kurosawa film I have seen is Yojimbo,
which I enjoyed, but haven’t seen in a while. I am looking forward to filling
in this huge gap
Immediate
Reaction
To be honest, I did not find Rashomon very gripping. I suppose my
biggest problem was that I found some of the execution a bit poor, especially
the fight scenes. The sword fights between The Bandit, played by Toshiro Mifune,
and The Samurai, Masayuki Mori, were not convincing in the slightest. It looks
like they are trying whap each other with plastic sword and, as a result, there
really isn’t a sense of tension when they spar. The actors commit themselves
physically during these scenes, Mifune in particular seems like he is rolling
around in the dirt half the time, but the actual swordplay is so amateurish
that it hurts the flow of the film.
I have also been wrestling with the
film’s treatment of the only female character, The Wife, played by Machiko Kyo.
She bounces from a shrill harpy, an encourager of murder, and a mocking
presence throughout the course of the film. Having said that, I know that the
film takes place in medieval Japan, so I shouldn’t expect women to behave the
same way they do know. Furthermore, the main incident of the film is told from
the perspective of four different characters. There is nothing to indicate if a
character is telling the truth or altering the real events to suit their own
needs. Likewise, at the end of the film, none of the retellings seems truer than
the others. It is entirely possible that The Wife character came off poorly
because the plot of the film is told with a bias. However, her portrayal was
still off for me in a way that Ugetsu
managed to avoid.
Now, I do not mind if a film does not
viscerally engage me as long as I find an interesting theme to ponder. However,
Rashomon evaporated from my mind
almost immediately after watching it. I was worried that I would not be able to
write anything about it. The main idea I took from Rashomon is that it is commenting on how everyone sees the world in
a different way and even actual event can be open to interpretation. This even
works as a sly comment about movie watching, because no one, due to their own
personal experiences and biases, is going to get the same thing from a film or
other work of art. I like that idea, but I had that thought before I even sat
down to watch the film. I suppose Rashomon could
be seen as a warning to the people of Japan against re-interpreting or
forgetting the events of World War II. I imagine that Japanese actions during
that conflict were distorted or forgotten in its immediate aftermath, and Rashomon was released in 1950, so its
timing fits well with that idea.
Further
thoughts
Rashomon may be a film that is hard to appreciate now due to
how much other films have stolen from it. At this point, a nonlinear narrative
is nothing special. Only about half the films I watch on a weekly basis have a
strictly linear structure. In fact, a few of the films on this very list seem
to crib directly from Kurosawa’s film. These include Mulholland Drive, Close-Up,
and La Jetee. What is David Lynch’s
masterpiece if not an examination of the subjective memories of its lead
character? And what is Close-Up if not
a maddening look at the intersection of reality and fiction. The same
statements could be applied to Rashomon as
well. Realizing this fact helps me appreciate the film a bit more than I
initially did. If viewed through the lens of a film like Mulholland Drive or Close-Up,
Rashomon can be seen as one of the
first instances of a film investigating the line between memory, reality, and
fiction. That is a very modern notion for a film made so long ago and an idea
that I think about often and enjoy exploring through this specific medium.
Why
is the film on this list?
Rashomon manages to question the nature of reality in a
direct, economical manner. Its nonlinear narrative and intentional obfuscation
of memory and truth make it a hugely influential film.
No comments:
Post a Comment