An image from the film this blog is named after.

An image from the film this blog is named after.

Tuesday, May 12, 2020

BFI Top 50: The Godfather, Released in 1972, Directed by Francis Ford Coppola

What I know going in
I have seen the film once before. However, it was about 8 years ago, so I know the overall plot beats, but I am a bit fuzzy on all of the details.

Immediate reaction
In The Story of Film Mark Cousins introduces three new styles of filmmaking that came about in the 70’s as part of the New Hollywood movement. These categories were satirical, dissident, and assimilationist. The first two, are self-explanatory. The last may need to be elucidated further. According to Cousins, assimilationist films reworked old studio genres (gangster, western, noir, melodrama) with new techniques. These films such as The Last Picture Show, Badlands, and The Wild Bunch would apply the style of Old Hollywood to New Hollywood subject matter.

Of course, The Godfather is an assimilationist film. In the past, the gangster picture had stayed primarily in the realm of quick, suspenseful films with clear, black and white morals. The Godfather takes the subject of an old crime picture, the progress of a group of people in the criminal underworld, and expands it into a near three hour epic about the importance of family, the immigrant experience, and the American dream. The various characters that weave in and out of the film cannot be defined as only criminals. They all have complex motivations and histories that inform their decisions and lead to their eventual fates. Vito rationalizes his hard criminal past as a means to support his children, but has become soft in his later years. Sonny has a hot temper and seems reckless, but moves to protect his sister when she is abused. However, this decision only expedites his ultimate demise. Finally, Michael feels alternatively pushed and pulled to and from the orbit of his family. He starts the film wanting to keep his distance from them, but when his father’s life is threatened, he starts heading down the path that will leave him shut off from his wife and children.

The sequence where Michael is consecrated as godfather to his nephew while simultaneously orchestrating several hits is justly praised for interweaving scenes of religious ceremony and intense violence. However, it is simply the film in microcosm. The Godfather has been working on a similar level during its entire runtime. All aspects of these characters exist close to each other. While Vito is handling business, children play around in his yard. When Pauli fails to protect Vito, his hit is carried out while the Stature of Liberty stands in the background and amber waves of grain waft in the wind. During Michael’s preparation to assassinate two rivals, a picture of a saint stares solemnly while Michael gets used to his new pistol. This heterogeneous mix of religion, family, violence, and business is the genius of The Godfather.

Further Thoughts
I’m not one to pay too much attention to acting, but nearly all of the performance in The Godfather deserved to be discussed. This, and Apocalypse Now, are the only films I have seen Marlon Brando in, so it has for me to judge the full impact of his portrayal of Vito Corleone. I imagine for audience members who new Brando from such films as A Streetcar Named Desire and On the Waterfront, seeing him as the old, decaying head of the Corleone family must have been a revelation. Heath Ledger’s performance as The Joker in The Dark Knight or Joaquin Phoenix’s portrayal of Freddie Quell in The Master could be seen as similar transformations.

Furthermore, Al Pacino is almost unrecognizable as Vito’s brooding young son, Michael. Pacino’s portrayal of Michael is free of all the tics that would come to define in his later years. There are no big scenes of yelling or mega-acting. Pacino is capable of displaying a wide range of emotions through eye movement or small facial gestures. The best example is the scene where Michael goes to assassinate a rival gang member and a corrupt cop in a rustic Italian restaurant. Pacino displays Michael’s ambivalence about the situation and his rage about the hit on his father without even speaking.


Why is the film on the list?
I feel like anything I say here is just going to be a cliché at this point, so I’ll keep it short and just say to watch the film and let it speak 

No comments:

Post a Comment